AI Visibility Scorecard
Thinking with Types: Type
thinkingwithtypes.com · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Thinking with Types: Type, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 5 times
Meta AI · Claude
#945,532 of 2,705,685 in Technology for AI visibility
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5/10
0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About Thinking with Types: Type
from our crawl and measurement
"Thinking with TypesType-Level Programming in Haskell Buy Now About Contents Contact The book that takes you from a competent Haskell programmer to one whose compiler does the work for you." That is how Thinking with Types: Type introduces itself. Its AI visibility score is 5.0 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.
The site gets some of it right: it has a readable heading structure. What holds it back is what is absent, including structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file, a sitemap.
Our monitoring has logged one AI crawler visit here: the engines come, the question is what they find.
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Weak
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Fair
Established authority for your domain.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Fair
Forum and community discussion.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5/10, Thinking with Types: Type is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Thinking with Types: Type
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Thinking with Types: Type.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on July 31, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/thinkingwithtypes
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Thinking with Types: Type." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/thinkingwithtypes
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform