AI Visibility Scorecard
Usability Counts
usabilitycounts.com · Technology
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Usability Counts, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 8 times
Claude · Meta AI · Apple Intelligence
#63,256 of 2,707,521 in Technology for AI visibility
6
AEO Visibility
iVisible · 6.4/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
4
AI Adoption
iBasic · 4/100
About Usability Counts
from our crawl and measurement
"They include empathy, curiosity, and being systematic." That is how Usability Counts introduces itself. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 6.4 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (CollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Fair
Established authority for your domain.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Good
Forum and community discussion.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 6.4/10, Usability Counts has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
How to generate impactful problem statements using prompts and uxGPT Problem Statements?
Most people jump to solutions, but understanding the problem first is crucial. Doing this helps align your team on the proper framing. Read GPT Prompt Guide
How to develop a usability testing plan using prompts and uxGPT Usability Testing Plans?
Usability testing plans are crucial because they ensure that the product you’re building meets its users’ needs and expectations. It’s testing the house before anyone lives in it. Read GPT Prompt Guide
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Usability Counts
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The AEO Checklist Every Small Business Owner Needs Right Now
Your potential customers are asking ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude questions about your product category. These AI models are giving answers without sending traffic to your website. You're not losing rank. You're losing visibility entirely.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Usability Counts.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on July 31, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/usabilitycounts
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Usability Counts." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/usabilitycounts
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform