AI Visibility Scorecard
ward.com · E-commerce
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Ward Recycling, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 6 times
Claude · Amazon Alexa · Apple Intelligence · Meta AI
#64,061 of 738,283 in E-commerce for AI visibility
98
AI Naming Predictability
iAI names companies like this · 98/100
6
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.9/10
45
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Agent-ready · 45/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
Ward Recycling, based in Swadlincote, Derbyshire, describes itself simply: "Ward Recycling offer complete waste management solutions ensuring minimal waste to landfill." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.9 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Organization, LocalBusiness), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic) and AmazonBot (Alexa AI).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Fair
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Good
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Strong
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.9/10, Ward Recycling has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Ward Recycling
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Ward Recycling.
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/ward
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Ward Recycling." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/ward
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform