AI Visibility Scorecard
random hacks
xakcop.com · Technology
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read random hacks, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 8 times
Meta AI · ChatGPT · Claude
#269,391 of 2,705,580 in Technology for AI visibility
6
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.7/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About random hacks
from our crawl and measurement
random hacks works in Technology. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.7 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
On the page itself the strengths are clear: a clear heading structure. It is passable on basic crawler access and partial sitemap and link coverage. What holds it back is a clearly stated business identity, structured data describing the business and credibility markers like credentials or reviews.
Away from its own site, other sites link to it and people discuss it in places AI engines read. There is some, but not much, sign that the domain is only lightly established. Beyond that, AI engines do not yet recognise it as a distinct business, there is no press coverage to draw on and it does not come up on Reddit. Those are earned elsewhere on the web, not fixed on the site itself.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic). It does link out to several social profiles, which helps engines tie the brand together.
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Good
Forum and community discussion.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.7/10, random hacks has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many people are around?
26 May 2020, 17:41 There is a nice open-source project howmanypeoplearearound that counts the number of people around by sniffing WiFi probe requests sent from mobile phones. Well, now we have another method to do the same by exploiting the contact tracing functionality which is being added to iOS and Android.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for random hacks
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for random hacks.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 11, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/xakcop
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for random hacks." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/xakcop
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform