AI Visibility Scorecard
Measure of Doubt
jessegalef.com · Sports & Recreation
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Measure of Doubt, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 5 times
Claude · Meta AI · Apple Intelligence
#15,315 of 251,109 in Sports & Recreation for AI visibility
6
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.9/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
2
AI Adoption
iBasic · 2/100
About Measure of Doubt
from our crawl and measurement
"Cryptic Crosswords are my favorite form of wordplay." That is how Measure of Doubt introduces itself. Its AI visibility score is 5.9 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.
Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Good
Forum and community discussion.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.9/10, Measure of Doubt has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Cognitive Bias is Making NFL Coaches Predictable?
February 5, 2017 by Jesse Galef 6 Comments In football, it pays to be unpredictable (although the “wrong way touchdown” might be taking it a bit far.) If the other team picks up on an unintended pattern in your play calling, they can take advantage of it and adjust their strategy to counter yours.
Irrationality? Or Confounding Variables?
Since this is an observational study rather than a randomized control trial, there are bound to be confounding variables. In our case, we’re comparing coaches’ play calling on 2nd down after getting no yards on their team’s 1st down rush or pass. But those scenarios don’t come from the same distribution of game situations. A number of variables could be in play, some exaggerating the trend and others minimizing it.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Measure of Doubt
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Measure of Doubt.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 7, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/jessegalef
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Measure of Doubt." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/jessegalef
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform